(meteorobs) Taurid/Antihelion speed

Geert Barentsen geert at barentsen.be
Thu Nov 3 08:31:39 EST 2005


At 23:01 27-10-2005, you wrote:
>It may make sense to list these meteors as anthelions or "ANT" but a majority
>of meteor organizations prefer that you list them from the constellation in
>which the radiant is currently located or the constellation where the shower
>reaches maximum activity. Those who send their reports to the International
>Meteor Organization (IMO) should list these meteors as Southern (STA) or
>Northern Taurids (NTA), depending on whether the meteors radiate from south
>or north of the ecliptic.

Hi Robert,

A late reaction on the most recent meteor activity outlook. According to 
the advice, one should report antihelion meteors as Taurids to IMO. 
Shouldn't it mention that it is important to take a meteor's angular 
velocity into account during shower association? (Sporadic antihelion 
meteors from this region are often noticeably faster than the "average" 
Taurid to me...)

Cheers,
Geert


PS: Very nice Taurid activity last weekend.












More information about the Meteorobs mailing list