(meteorobs) hollow earth theory anyone?
Charles O'Dale
codale0806 at rogers.com
Fri Nov 25 12:55:01 EST 2005
We can put this under the quack quack science file.
The article about craters "proving" the hollow earth:
http://www.hollowearththeory.com/articles/impactCraters.asp
..... is an excellent example of doing pseudoscience and avoiding all that
hard mathematics.
The author of this pseudoscience "forgot" the energy formula of impacts:
e = 1/2 mv^2
... and what that would do to the target bedrock (IE: large scale melting -
to a depth of >100 km at Sudbury).
BTW, the energy formula explains why most craters are round. The exceptions
are when there is a very low angle of impact.
Chuck
Charles O'Dale
Meeting Chair
Ottawa RASC
http://www.ottawa.rasc.ca/astronomy/earth_craters/index.html
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:22:26 +0200
> From: Arlene Carol <arlene.carol at gmail.com>
> Subject: (meteorobs) hollow earth theory anyone?
> To: meteorobs <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
> Message-ID:
> <ae26d6150511242322m303679dfwd20757f14ede6cd8 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Listening to Live-feed radio from back in the US, I 'fell' into this...
>
> if you have a chance (we've got heavy winds and rain, no meteor watching
> here this weekend!!),
> take a look and listen to this...
>
> http://www.hollowearththeory.com/
>
>
> arlene
> south of troy
>
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list