(meteorobs) Re: Antihelion/Chi Orionids
Robert Lunsford
lunro.imo.usa at cox.net
Mon Dec 18 00:43:21 EST 2006
Paul, Bruce, and All,
The Xi Orionids and the Antihelions are the same thing. If Mark wished to
keep the XOR's then these Antihelion meteors should have been included in
the XOR count. Hopefully this point will soon be moot as the IMO will
implement the Antihelions as a year-round shower in 2007, replacing the
Delta Cancrids, Virginids, Sagittarids, North Delta Aquarids, both Iota
Aquarid radiants, the Piscids, and finally the Xi Orionids. The Taurids will
remain intact as they and the Antihelions are inseparable. Since NAMN has
copied the IMO list in the past I assume they will in the future and will
include the Antihelions.
Clear Skies!
Bob Lunsford
----- Original Message -----
From: <pmartsching at mchsi.com>
To: "meteorobs" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:19 PM
Subject: (meteorobs) Antihelion/Chi Orionids
> Mark,
>
> I take it that in my case the Antihelion meteors are also included in the
> Sporadics.
>
> I took it that the Antihelion and Chi Orionids are the same thing. I'd
> thought
> that perhaps rather than naming the various ecliptic showers that now they
> are
> all called Antihelion meteors.
>
> In my summaries for my own records I just do the Antihelion meteors for
> each
> individual month without regard for their "shower names". Of course the
> Antihelion meteors of October and November are included with the Taurids,
> because they cannot be separated visually, but I still do October and
> November
> separately. I also do December separately, even tho the Chi Orionids are
> often
> said to begin in late November. It has always seemed to me that some of
> the
> ecliptic shower dates are somewhat arbitrary - how can you really be sure
> that
> the Taurids/November Antihelions are ended and the Chi Orionids/late
> November
> and December Antihelions begin. It always bothered me that for months in
> the
> spring the Antihelions are called Virginids even tho the radiant was very
> far
> away from Virgo.
>
> Paul
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list