(meteorobs) Electrophonics?-Addendum

[stange34 at sbcglobal.net]

I should add, that there is no (conclusive) evidence that electrophonic 
"sound" is definetly acoustic sound using air as a medium. It can also be 
some form of electrical or magnetic pulse which effects the physiology of 
humans and electronic devices, such as coils in the proximity of magnets or 
magnets which are in the proximity of coils, which are the elements of a 
(common) microphone.

It would have been nice to have had a closed microphone leg which could not 
respond to air pressure as a control channel at Mongolia to determine 
whether air even is the medium for the electrophonic sound heard by 
observers.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Powers" <dave at minutemancomm.com>
To: <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
Sent: 2007/04/05 19:37
Subject: (meteorobs) Electrophonics?


> With the myriad of electronic systems currently in use on our planet. is 
> it
> possible that vast quantities of useful "electrophonic" data has already
> been collected?
>
> But, simply discarded?  As "noise."
>
>
>
> All communications systems are prone to interference.  With filtering, 
> error
> correction, shielding, etc the important signals are extracted.  The
> un-wanted signals are ignored.
>
>
>
> Are there clues in "the chaos of interference?"
>
>
>
> I'm sure this principle has been investigated.
>
> Just curious!
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>