(meteorobs) Hypervelocity meteors
meteoreye at comcast.net
meteoreye at comcast.net
Tue Dec 11 10:04:11 EST 2007
That is correct. AFAIK, this would be the first detection of meteoroids that were uneqivocally not part of the solar system, never mind the galaxy.
Wayne
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Francisco Ocaña <albireo3000 at yahoo.es>
> Hello list,
>
> before reading this article I thought that meteors at v>73km/s were
> uncommon. What do you know/think about this topic?
>
>
> arXiv:0712.1571
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:11:42 GMT (401kb)
>
> Title: Detection of an intergalactic meteor particle with the 6-m telescope
> Authors: V.L. Afanasiev (1), V.V. Kalenichenko (2), I.D. Karachentsev
> (1) ((1)
> Special Astrophysical Observatory Russian Academy of Sciences (2)
> Astronomical Observatory, Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University)
> Categories: astro-ph
> Comments: 9 pages, 6 EPS figures
> Journal-ref: Astrophysical Bulletin, 2007, v. 62, p. 301-310
> \\
> On July 28, 2006 the 6-m telescope of the Special Astrophysical
> Observatory
> of the Russian Academy of Sciences recorded the spectrum of a faint
> meteor. We
> confidently identify the lines of FeI and MgI, OI, NI and
> molecular-nitrogen
> N_2 bands. The entry velocity of the meteor body into the Earth's
> atmosphere
> estimated from radial velocity is equal to 300 km/s. The body was
> several tens
> of a millimeter in size, like chondrules in carbon chondrites. The
> radiant of
> the meteor trajectory coincides with the sky position of the apex of the
> motion
> of the Solar system toward the centroid of the Local Group of galaxies.
> Observations of faint sporadic meteors with FAVOR TV CCD camera
> confirmed the
> radiant at a higher than 96% confidence level. We conclude that this meteor
> particle is likely to be of extragalactic origin. The following important
> questions remain open: (1) How metal-rich dust particles came to be in the
> extragalactic space? (2) Why are the sizes of extragalactic particles
> larger by
> two orders of magnitude (and their masses greater by six orders of
> magnitude)
> than common interstellar dust grains in our Galaxy? (3) If extragalactic
> dust
> surrounds galaxies in the form of dust (or gas-and-dust) aureoles, can such
> formations now be observed using other observational techniques (IR
> observations aboard Spitzer satellite, etc.)? (4) If inhomogeneous
> extragalactic dust medium with the parameters mentioned above actually
> exists,
> does it show up in the form of irregularities on the cosmic microwave
> background (WMAP etc.)?
> \\ ( http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1571 , 401kb)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list