(meteorobs) Radio meteors and digital TV stations

Siddhartha Jain siddhartha at siddharthajain.net
Wed Dec 26 05:31:53 EST 2007


Channels 2-6 will go dead. For me, channel 6 is a good source here in
the SF Bay area.

- Siddhartha

On 7/30/07, stange34 at sbcglobal.net <stange34 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> As long as the TV stations continue to transmit a
> standard channel frequency RF carrier which "carrys" any newly developed
> digitized video & audio information, the scatter signals shouldn't be
> effected because you are essentially only detecting the presence of the
> fixed carrier and its reflections and not decoding the video/audio content
> in scatter signals.
>
> This general statement does not include commercial pulse modulating stations
> or other specialized transmitters.
>
> Such is what I believe to be true.
>
> YCSentinel
>
>
> Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Boschat" <aa063 at chebucto.ns.ca>
> To: "Global Meteor Observing" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
> Sent: 2007/07/30 11:31
> Subject: (meteorobs) Radio meteors and digital TV stations
>
>
> > Hi:
> >
> > I'm trying to remember if all the TV stations go digital that it will be
> > harder
> > to detect meteors by radio?  I use TV Ch.6 right now. at 83.25 MHz.
> > Anywere on the internet to read this or somone to give a brief reply?
> >
> > --
> > Clear skies
> > ----
> > Michael Boschat
> > Royal Astronomical Society of Canada - Halifax Center Astronomy page:
> > http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa063
> >
> > ---
> > Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> > http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
> >
>
>
> ---
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>



More information about the Meteorobs mailing list