(meteorobs) Meteors, natural and otherwise
stange34 at sbcglobal.net
stange34 at sbcglobal.net
Sun Oct 21 00:53:09 EDT 2007
OK Chris, thankyou.
That settles it.... I am going to try day & night with the IR dome starting
right now.(15 minutes). I will try a much higher sensitivity setting to help
offset the reduction in magnitude.
Just "maybe" it can do both worlds with a common sensitivity setting without
too much false triggering...... It will be an interesting trial
Larry
YCSentinel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Peterson" <clp at alumni.caltech.edu>
To: "Global Meteor Observing Forum" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
Sent: 2007/10/20 21:35
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Meteors, natural and otherwise
> No, I see no reason to reduce my overall sensitivity, which is only
> about mag 2 as it is. What advantage would the filtered dome provide?
>
> Chris
>
> *****************************************
> Chris L Peterson
> Cloudbait Observatory
> http://www.cloudbait.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <stange34 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Global Meteor Observing Forum" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 10:29 PM
> Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Meteors, natural and otherwise
>
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Have you captured meteors at night with an IR dome one of your PC164C
>> cameras?
>>
>> Larry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list