(meteorobs) Correction to previous Trig.calculation.

stange34 at sbcglobal.net stange34 at sbcglobal.net
Wed Sep 19 00:44:35 EDT 2007


Agreed(in part) Chris.  It did lose mass by fragmentation earlier. But the 
possibility of that event being cited in the future as a classic earth 
grazer example is overwhelming to me and I await formal calculations by 
others that could substantiate that with bated breath. :-)

Larry


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Peterson" <clp at alumni.caltech.edu>
To: "Global Meteor Observing Forum" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
Sent: 2007/09/18 21:37
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Correction to previous Trig.calculation.


>I would say that the meteor never stopped ablating (luminescence without 
>ablation is essentially impossible). My interpretation of this event is 
>that the body penetrated deeply and simply burned up. I've seen many 
>fireballs that follow this pattern. Only some show terminal explosions. 
>This one seems to have fragmented and lost a lot of mass earlier in its 
>path.
>
> Chris
>
> *****************************************
> Chris L Peterson
> Cloudbait Observatory
> http://www.cloudbait.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <stange34 at sbcglobal.net>
> To: "Global Meteor Observing Forum" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:26 PM
> Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Correction to previous Trig.calculation.
>
>
>> Hi Chris.
>>
>> The altitude was set at 60 miles because the actual altitude is unknown 
>> at this time and is not likely higher. The generally accepted thought is 
>> ablation begins at 60miles or less. This was clearly stated as a 
>> condition for the estimated path shown.
>>
>> Notwithstanding that, if the actual elevation is less it will only shift 
>> the line closer to Albuquerque. The path line should stay essentially 
>> entact in direction.
>>
>> I tried to indicate this graph is predicated on only one photograph(the 
>> ablation) and the object was to show the possibility earth grazing may 
>> have occured because of the meteors luminescence beyond the point of 
>> major ablation.
>>
>> Larry
>> YCSentinel
>
> ---
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
> 




More information about the Meteorobs mailing list