(meteorobs) 2008 Orionids
Chris Peterson
clp at alumni.caltech.edu
Fri Oct 24 19:52:55 EDT 2008
A couple of old installations still have PC23C cameras with hemi mirrors,
but nearly all the setups are PC164C based.
I don't have direct experience with the 710E/C. However, it uses the same
sort of Sony Ex-view HAD sensor that virtually all the high sensitivity
cameras use. I don't find a practical difference in sensitivity for meteor
work. For instance, I can run a PC164C (1/3") right next to a Watec 902H
(1/2") or 120N (at 30fps) and I get exactly the same results. Slowing the
frame integration time, however, does reduce sensitivity.
I'd like to run a Sentinel system right next to my other allsky camera. My
system seems more sensitive based on comparisons with Sentinel users meteor
counts, but I don't know what's really going on there. Of course, lower
sensitivity could also be related to the meteor detection process, and not
the actual camera sensitivity.
Chris
*****************************************
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Watson" <sierra_mtnview at sbcglobal.net>
To: "Global Meteor Observing Forum" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) 2008 Orionids
> As I vaguely recall, you use several camera setups. In fact, don't you
> have sites outside your main area? Do they all use that camera? Do you
> believe it's more sensitive than the Senintel camera, Hi-cam
> Camera--HB-710E/C? See <http://www.hicam.co.kr/>. It's buried in there
> somewhere. Every time I bookmark it, it ends up as their home page.
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list