(meteorobs) Train production...was something else. :O)
Leo S
l.stachowicz at btinternet.com
Fri Dec 18 16:15:06 EST 2009
Thank you for posting that data George, and the snippet from the
meteorite-list. Very interesting breakdown of the statistics!
It's been a long time since I saw anything like the amount of Geminids
observed this year, and also since I observed them under relatively dark
skies. No doubt that has skewed my recollection of past showers at least
a bit. I need to get out of town more I think ;)
What surprised me most, and this is assuming that the meteors captured
by the cameras were not much brighter than those I was seeing, was that
the longest lasting train I saw lasted perhaps no longer than 2-3
seconds (-3 or -4 mag. meteors with an estimated sky LM of about +6 in
the zenith, but only down to about 15 degrees. Below that, where most of
the brighter Geminids were seen, the LM rapidly rose!), but the cameras
were able to "see" them for many minutes.
It shouldn't surprise me I know since cameras are much better at
gathering photons over time, but it still does!
Even so I have not come across this before (even with the faster
showers) to this degree at least, but perhaps it is just down to having
more cameras running than before, and catching a few chance events,
although I still can't help but wonder if somehow the conditions at high
altitude where the trains are formed were somehow more favorable for
train formation/longevity than they usually are.
Clear Skies!
Leo
geozay at aol.com wrote:
> I'm not sure the first sent made it to the lists...so we might have a
> double posting...sorry about that.
> geo
>
>>> Would anyone care to share their knowledge of the factors at play in the
>>>
> production of visible "trains"? I would surmise that the velocity of the
> object has less to do with this than the mass and the penetration to denser
> lower altitudes.<<
>
> Here are some more of what I have recorded from my observations during the
> 1990's. I'm sure the number of bright magnitudes and number of meteors in
> my survey will have some influence, but I think velocity strongly enters
> the picture for visible train production. Also Sky magnitude and personal
> visual acuity will have some influence as well.
>
> Shower Entry Velocity # of Meteors
> Train Production
>
> Leonid 71km/s 573
> 55%
> Eta Aquarid 66km/s 158
> 45.6%
> Aurigids 66km/s 52
> 40.4%
> Orinids 66km/s 459
> 38.1%
> Coma Bernicids 65km/s 14
> 35.7%
> Delta Aurigids 64km/s 100
> 31%
> Perseids 59km/s 1357
> 41.4%
> Hydrids 58km/s 26
> 7.7%
> Lyrids 49km/s 179
> 16.2%
> N.Delta Aquarids 42km/s 96
> 3.1%
> S. Delta Aquarids 41km/s 263
> 4.6%
> Quadrantids 41km/s 104
> 5.8%
> Geminids 35km/s 1413
> 3.2%
> Virginids 30km/s 120
> 4.2%
> N.Taurids 29km/s 437
> 1.6%
> Delta Cancrids 28km/s 18
> 0%
> S. TAurids 27km/s 311
> 0.32%
> Capricornids 25km/s 127
> 3.9%
> sporadics N/A 5900
> 13.8%
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>
>
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list