(meteorobs) Sort of apology to meteorobs
MEM
mstreman53 at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 27 09:50:14 EDT 2011
Interesting development. I wish I had known it was this easy before all the
chaos.
All you need to do to close out a line of fallacious postings
is to ask the poster to share a little expertise, to give a little help, or to
clarify their position.
Now maybe we can get back to normal as everyone's positions
are on record in the archives.
Very insightful exchange of philosophy and dynamics, Thanks.
Elton
----- Original Message ----
> From: Wayne Hally <meteoreye at comcast.net>
> To: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> Sent: Sat, March 26, 2011 6:39:24 AM
> Subject: (meteorobs) Sort of apology to meteorobs
>
> Look folks, I know I've been kind of a pain lately. But I just cannot let
> unsupported/bad science/hype pass by unchallenged. If any post has validity,
> there is real data to back it up. I always have that for anything I write. I
> don't think it's wrong to ask for support of assertions.
>
>
>
> Apparently some others on this maillist take offense at that. To them I say
> tough. Science is based on real data and analysis. If you have nothing to
> back up what you've said, you retract it as being fact, or admit it was
> just speculation.
>
>
>
> Speculation is fine, as long as it is so labeled.
>
> Wayne
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list meteorobs: meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email: owner-meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>
More information about the Meteorobs
mailing list