(meteorobs) Fwd: "meteor smoke" is essential to the formation of noctilucent clouds.

[Richard Kramer]

Whatever your beliefs might be about climate change, what has climate 
change got to do with methane emission levels? That's what made it 
gratuitous. There is no excuse for this type of bad science writing. 
When it bears the NASA brand name it is very embarrassing.

At 01:46 PM 8/4/2012, Anthony DeBartolo wrote:
>imho, if you live on this planet, it wasn't.
>
>On Aug 3, 2012, at 7:06 PM, Richard Kramer wrote:
>
>The gratuitous, irrelevant mention of climate change was very irritating.
>
>At 02:43 PM 8/3/2012, Michael Boschat wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > As "meteors" are involved....
> >
> > Check this out:
> >
> > A key ingredient of Earth's strangest clouds does not come from Earth. New
> > data from NASA's AIM spacecraft proves that "meteor smoke" is essential to
> > the formation of noctilucent clouds.
> >
> > A video on YOutube shows it all:
> >
> > http://youtu.be/Qzs9ZOsjF-c
> >
> >
> > Clear skies
> > -----------
> > Michael Boschat
> > Halifax Center- Royal Astronomical Society of Canada
> > web page: http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~aa063
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > meteorobs mailing list
> > meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> > http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>
>_______________________________________________
>meteorobs mailing list
>meteorobs at meteorobs.org
>http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>
>
>
>Anthony DeBartolo
>hydeparkmedia.com
>reporter/editor/publisher
>
>lupusUVA1phototherapy.com
>editor/publisher
>
>_______________________________________________
>meteorobs mailing list
>meteorobs at meteorobs.org
>http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs