(meteorobs) VLF Meteor Observations

[bob alongi]

George - I know quite well what electrophonics are; Jim's hypothesis for VLF emissions is very similar to some of the mechanisms/hypothesis' for electrophonics, and that is the reason for the posting to Jim.



--- On Wed, 3/21/12, drobnock <drobnock at penn.com> wrote:

> From: drobnock <drobnock at penn.com>
> Subject: Re: (meteorobs) VLF Meteor Observations
> To: "Meteor science and meteor observing" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
> Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2012, 8:39 AM
> Just a quick  note - 
> electrophonic observations and radio are not the same in the
> method of observation.In this discussion the use of a
> "receiver" is a radio or wireless
> receiver... The implication of meteors being heard/received
> on a radio go back to the 1900's. The beginning of radio. So
> please keep in mind to separated the two.
> George John Drobnock
> 
> bob alongi wrote:
> 
> > Jim - You are correct about the meteor VLF research;
> most studies are just reports of observations with out any
> follow up or substantiation by others.
> >
> > For a little more insight into your meteor VLF
> hypothesis, Google "meteor electrophonics" . I believe that
> the electrophoric event is the most severe form of VLF
> emission.
> >
> > bob
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > meteorobs mailing list
> > meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> > http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> meteorobs mailing list
> meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>