(meteorobs) The best Meteor detector on Earth

[James Beauchamp]

The new system is rumored to be X band, pulsed, with integrated array / auto-track, so it will not be meteor useable. We are lucky to have Kickapoo for meteor scatter as it is.
 
This doesn't mean that something could be worked at the research level with NASA, Sandia, or other academic organization to support a dedicated meteor emitter.
 
The problem will be the cost of equipment, maintenance, and facilities.  A location, equipment, power budget, and maintenance staff would be required.  
 
On the amateur radio side, a stable, CW emitter with periodic ID (modulated on the carrier) would be well within the rules.  The challenge is the required power.  You'll need lots of it to compensate for the wide pattern required for decent sky coverage.  1 KW PEP won't suffice.
 
And it also has to be extremely frequency stable - something the average 6 meter amateur system doesn't normally have.
 
 


--- On Sun, 9/16/12, Jay Salsburg <jsalsburg at bellsouth.net> wrote:


From: Jay Salsburg <jsalsburg at bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) The best Meteor detector on Earth
To: cheekygeek at gmail.com, "'Meteor science and meteor observing'" <meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
Date: Sunday, September 16, 2012, 10:57 PM







Thank you 
 
My message did not express any suggestion that NAVSPASUR has no benefits to National Security because that Faction is the operator. Since I now know that NAVSPASUR is being decommissioned and replaced with a higher frequency system, my efforts to take advantage of NAVSPASUR will be transferred to the new system, which I suspect will operate at 432 MHz hopefully at the same location as the Kickapoo Site. But that means waiting for something to happen, which sucks. If anyone knows of helpful web links to help decide a course of action please forward them.
 
My message to create a Proposal was a plea for action to this (meteorobs) group.
 

From: meteorobs-bounces at meteorobs.org [mailto:meteorobs-bounces at meteorobs.org] On Behalf Of CheekyGeek
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2012 8:20 AM
To: Meteor science and meteor observing
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) The best Meteor detector on Earth
 
It might be worth considering, in this age of budget cuts, whether your laudable goals might have unintended consequences. You might put a system that is on no "bean counter's" radar under scrutiny for shutdown, particularly if you make your case that there is no ancillary National Security benefits from the project.

 

You may be thinking of how NOAA freely shares much of its weather data as the model for your NAVASPASUR data sharing plan. But weather has the general public's interests and direct benefit on its side. Only a small fraction of us care about meteor data.

 

Perhaps an intermediate step might be to try to get the government to share the data with university research departments. It should be easier to get university faculty members, department chairs, Deans, etc. to sign a petition for such a data sharing initiative (or start with a "pilot program". Nothing involving government/politics happens overnight ( except violent overthrow). To achieve your goal I would recommend plotting out the necessary " baby steps".

 



On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Jay Salsburg wrote:
Hello

My name is Jay Salsburg. I have been monitoring the NAVASPASUR SPACE RADAR
transmitter in Kickapoo Texas for many years. I am beginning to wonder why;
Why am I doing this? I get no benefits other than the unique direct
experience of hearing and seeing Doppler events caused by Objects moving in
Low Earth Orbit over North Texas, Southern Oklahoma, and Eastern New Mexico.

The point is that the US Government operates the best Meteor Detection
Network on the Planet but does not share the Data.

I CALL FOR ACTION: for the US Government to share the live DATA Stream and
any Archives of DATA of the NAVSPASUR Receiver array, in the name of
Science.

I imagine the best approach is to Draft a Proposal authored by the Meteor
Observation Community to be presented to Congress. Expecting opposition from
certain unfriendly US Government elements in the name of "National
Security," those who may oppose are actually not in charge of this
Instrumentality and its DATA. Protected by Congressional Acts, Congress is
in charge of this system and National Security is not the issue, Money is
the issue as it is always the issue.

Please provide comments, ideas, and suggestions.

Jay

_______________________________________________
meteorobs mailing list
meteorobs at meteorobs.org
http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs



No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2437/5272 - Release Date: 09/16/12
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
meteorobs mailing list
meteorobs at meteorobs.org
http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.meteorobs.org/pipermail/meteorobs/attachments/20120917/451a6d76/attachment.html