(meteorobs) perhaps some radio observers would take a gander?

[Jay Salsburg]

Monitoring this phenomenon may require millions of dollars per year not to
mention a dedicated facility (Antennae or Satellite) and Staff willing to
work for several decades. For the same (social) reason, this is why Meteor
observation is scientifically underdeveloped. Perhaps someone with deep
pockets would invest in a splinter division of SETI to undertake a project
like this (like Sagan's CONTACT).

 

From: meteorobs-bounces at meteorobs.org
[mailto:meteorobs-bounces at meteorobs.org] On Behalf Of Steven Kolins
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 4:27 AM
To: Meteor Obs
Subject: (meteorobs) perhaps some radio observers would take a gander?

 

Hi,

 

Since there are radio observers on the list I thought I'd send this out with
apologies it isn't about meteors.

 

I was browsing and came across
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_source_SHGb02+14a

 

I was bit perplexed - there's been no followup for 10 years?!?!

 

Doesn't this at least tickle the bones to take a look?

 

At least get a better fix on the location and also start a longer range
listening project? Start some multispectral investigations? (Mind they said
it was faint at Arecibo..)

 

Anyone?

 

=    -   -  - - -  -   -    =

Steven Kolins

mailto:smkolins at mac.com

http://smk99.blogspot.com/

Possess a pure, kindly and radiant heart!

 

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3426 / Virus Database: 3657/6889 - Release Date: 12/03/13

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.meteorobs.org/pipermail/meteorobs/attachments/20131203/ab77e041/attachment.html