(meteorobs) Aftermath?
Esko Lyytinen
esko.lyytinen at jippii.fi
Tue Jun 11 16:39:09 EDT 2013
Thank you Terry !
Esko
> Esko, so far as narrowing down the radiant is concerned, I can tell
> you that each of the three Delphinid candidates I saw appeared to
> point back to an area between epsilon and beta Delphinus (the tail of
> the dolphin). They had semi-long paths, so tracing back was rather
> easy. I have no photographic or video proof of this, so just my
> visual report.
>
> Also, each one I saw occurred between 0700UT and 0815UT.
>
> --Terry
>
> *From:*meteorobs-bounces at meteorobs.org
> [mailto:meteorobs-bounces at meteorobs.org] *On Behalf Of *Esko Lyytinen
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:58 PM
> *To:* Meteor science and meteor observing
> *Subject:* Re: (meteorobs) Aftermath?
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> This prediction was based on three special things. One is that an
> outburst really happened in 1930, which most probably is true.
> Secondly it is based on the assumption that this was of a long period
> nature, a few hundred years in minimum. There is no actual knowledge
> on this and this is only based on the fact (above) of an unexpected
> short lived outburst that are typical to long period outbursts ( of
> one revolution trail).
> Thirdly this is based on the derived radiant. If the radiant derived
> from the visual observations in 1930 is too much in error, then also
> the prediction would fail (most probably would not appear or wery
> weakly only, definite time error is not probable). This case however
> is not especially sensitive to minor errors in this.
> It is now my opinion that this is not of long period, maybe of Hallye
> type.
>
> I just read in meteorobs on increased radio rater. Maybe this is a GDE
> outburst. If this really is, then it could be a non modelled outburst
> fron a Halley type comet maybe.
> Secondly, I am especially interested on the fireball that Thomas
> Ashcraft captured and told he expects to be a GDE. If this is, then
> hopefully some improvenemt to the radiant direction can be achived.
>
> Esko
>
> I am curious; what is the next step in meteor orbit modeling after
> an apparent failure, like that of the GDEs to 'burst out' or
> perhaps even to 'shower?' What can the modeler do? What about
> amateurs' roles?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Rich
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> meteorobs mailing list
>
> meteorobs at meteorobs.org <mailto:meteorobs at meteorobs.org>
>
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> meteorobs mailing list
> meteorobs at meteorobs.org
> http://lists.meteorobs.org/mailman/listinfo/meteorobs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.meteorobs.org/pipermail/meteorobs/attachments/20130611/efa24a3d/attachment.html
More information about the meteorobs
mailing list