Re: (meteorobs) Re:meteor notes

• To: meteorobs@latradedot com
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Re:meteor notes
• From: Lew Gramer <dedalus>
• Date: Mon, 10 Jun 96 13:56:38 -0400
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 08 Jun 96 04:54:31 EDT." <199606080854.EAA24274@perseus.peganetdot com>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@latradedot com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs

Thanks for another interesting message, Norman. I'd have no objection to making 
these longer postings of yours a regular occurrence on meteorobs!

>Nebulous meteors are interesting.
Indeed they are! I've never seen one. George mentioned having observed two (?) 
in his time under the sky. How frequently have others seen nebulous meteors, of 
the various types George, Norman, and Kasper (or Rainer?) hinted at?

>If the IMO does local hours automatically, then why not be sure you
>have started just before one of these hours starts?
This is something I had missed. Does this imply that the IMO is discarding data 
before the first 1:00 boundary and after the last one each night? Or that these 
start and end periods are treated differently from the rest in their analysis?

Lew Gramer

• (meteorobs) Re:meteor notes
• From: nmcleod@peganetdot com

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Meteor photography
• Next: (meteorobs) meteor colors redux (was Re: Meteor Times)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread