Re: (meteorobs) Possible Xi Perseid Radiant

• To: meteorobs@latradedot com
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Possible Xi Perseid Radiant
• From: LUNRO.IMO.USA@prodigydot com (MR ROBERT D LUNSFORD)
• Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 16:35:18, -0500
• Reply-To: meteorobs@latradedot com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs

-- [ From: Robert Lunsford * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --

Lew, You wrote:

> BTW, as a general question, are there any rules, when reporting to
ALPO or
> the  AMS, about using provisional 3-letter codes for these non-IMO
and/or
> prospective  radiants? In other words, should I be reporting XiP's,
XPe's,
> or something else?  (Of course, I know they're all "Spor" as far as
IMO is
> concerned. Just curious  what designations to use for reporting to
the
> other data collectors.)
> 
> Lew
> 
As far as ALPO is concerned, do not use a 3 letter code until we are
sure what we are dealing with is real. Leave it as a sporadic but
highlight each meteor as a "possible Eta Peresid" .

Bob

• Re: (meteorobs) Possible Xi Perseid Radiant
• From: Lew Gramer <dedalus>

• Prev: (meteorobs) New Observers
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Possible Xi Perseid Radiant
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread