Re: (meteorobs) Counting method time accuracy

• To: Meteor Observing Mailing List <meteorobs@latradedot com>
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Counting method time accuracy
• From: Lew Gramer <dedalus>
• Date: Fri, 02 Aug 96 13:13:34 -0400
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Aug 96 13:27:16 BST." <m0umJK1-0002vwC@solx1.central.susx.acdot uk>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@latradedot com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs

>the simple, rapid, act of recording each
>individual meteor's time will give the prurient
>information anyway.

I guess that depends on where you bought your watch! ;>

[Forgive me, Neil. I couldn't resist!]
Lew


PS: I'd advocate minute-accuracy recording, for the simple reason that it IS so 
simple, and the more data taken, the more potential use to future researchers. 
Certainly, as everyone seems to agree, minute accuracy IS needed for plots.

• Re: (meteorobs) Counting method time accuracy
• From: bafb4@central.susx.acdot uk (Neil Bone)

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Counting method time accuracy
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Counting method time accuracy
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread