[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: (meteorobs) Photoelectric cell meteor monitoring



Dear meteor observers,

With regard to the discussion quoted below, may I respectfully submit to you kind sirs that if you have plans
like this, you will also have to instruct your machines to avoid registering: Venus, Jupiter, Saturn,
Sirius, alfa Lyr.,  Capella, aircraft, etcetera. Maybe automation is fine, but you should not only register
light intensity, but at the same time relative motion, I think.
Sincerely,
--
Sent by:  Dick V. Gevers    Home: Speerdistelveld 5, 3448 EK  Woerden, NL
phone: (0031) (0) 348 420 279  Location:   520 04' 51" N.   -    040 41' 52" E.
E-mail: dvgevers@worldaccessdot nl
-------------------------Antwoord Scheidingsteken-----------------------------
Aan 19-08-96 18:02, in bericht <960819120201_388761738@emout08.mail.aoldot com>, GeoZay@aoldot com 
schreef:

> Received: from Arl-Mail-Svc-1dot compuservedot com (arl-mail-svc-1dot compuservedot com [149.174.211.4]) by 
> worldxs.worldaccessdot nl (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA11652 for 
> <dvgevers@worldaccessdot nl>; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 18:15:04 +0200
> Received: from gatekeeper-1.latradedot com (gatekeeper-1.latradedot com [199.120.237.18]) by 
> Arl-Mail-Svc-1dot compuservedot com (8.7.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA20287
> Received: by gatekeeper-1.latradedot com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
>   id AA01428; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:07:00 -0400
> Received: by turtle; (5.65/1.1.8.2/20Oct95-1034AM)
>   id AA04011; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:02:12 -0400
> Received: from gatekeeper by turtle; (5.65/1.1.8.2/20Oct95-1034AM)
>   id AA03996; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:02:07 -0400
> Received: by gatekeeper-1.latradedot com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
>   id AA01395; Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:05:16 -0400
> Received: by emout08.mail.aoldot com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA22635 for meteorobs@latradedot com; Mon, 19 
> Aug 1996 12:02:01 -0400
> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 12:02:01 -0400
> From: GeoZay@aoldot com
> Message-Id: <960819120201_388761738@emout08.mail.aoldot com>
> To: meteorobs@latradedot com
> Subject: (meteorobs) Photoelectric cell meteor monitoring
> Sender: owner-meteorobs@latradedot com
> Precedence: bulk
> Reply-To: meteorobs@latradedot com
> 
> In a message dated 96-08-17 11:32:10 EDT, you write:
> 
> << Works by means of photoelectric cell coupled to a computer.
>  Certainly catches meteors bright enough for camera's. We have two such units
>  operational, one in Leiden, one in Oostkapelle. You should ask Hans Betlem
>  for more details (betlem@strw.leidenunivdot nl), I only know that it exists and
>  works well (many years already), have had much benefit of it. Hardly ever
>  have an all-sky photograph without time of meteor known (only if both
>  mentioned stations were clouded out and other stations of us captured the
>  fireball...).
>  
>  Regards!
>  
>  Marco >>
> ------
> Marco,
> Has it ever been proposed (or done) to use your photoelectric cell hooked up
> to a chart recorder or pen recorder to catch high meteor rates for such
> events as the possible Leonid storms? Maybe if it is sensitive enough to
> catch -2's or brighter meteors, it would give a more real picture based on
> time as to the actual activity profile for a major storm such as the Leonids?
> I personally have been trying to devise such a set up for the past 2
> years...I've ran into some problems in that I'm getting some constant weird
> signals onto my chart recorder when I used a fairly large bank of solar
> cells.  With half the bank these signals are not present...but from what I
> can tell, it seems that what I presently have will give some kind of small
> signal for meteors in the neighborhood of -10..dot definitely not feasible for
> what I'm trying to do. It definitely responds to a full moon! I haven't tried
> on lesser moon phases...but it's possible? I was thinking that maybe it's
> "field of view" could be predetermined and overwhelming meteor rates can be
> more adequately calculated from the sampled sky ? Maybe the problem lies in
> my equipment, but perhaps with your more sophisticated equipment, perhaps a
> useable device can be constructed? I think it would have more meaning or at
> least complimentary meaning than a bank of camera's for such an event?It
> should show brite meteor hits with accurate times. Everyonce in awhile I will
> take another look at what I've got so far and make some more tests until I
> run out of ideas. Anyhow, Just thought I would throw it out there for
> everyone to chew on...later.
> George Zay
> 



References: