[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: (meteorobs) RE: Leonid max?



Ha Ha Ha,.... I replied to the wrong message...I was trying to be nasty to 
an e-mail ad.
As for meteorobs, please send me gobs of unsoliceted e-mail/.
Sorry for the clutter--- Brain spasm.

Wayne
-------------
Original Text
From: wayne.t.hally@bangate1.tekdot com, on 9/12/96 5:28 AM:
To: <meteorobs@latradedot com>

Lew, I have not seen the responses to your question...were they posted to 
the maillist and I didn't get them? You did press my curiosity button after 
all, and if you don't answer, I'll sic my skunk on you!! :@) Wayne
PS, that's a smiley with a gas mask
-------------
Original Text
From: Lew Gramer <dedalus@latradedot com>, on 9/12/96 10:38 AM:
To: "Meteor Observing Mailing List" <meteorobs@latradedot com>

Thanks for all responses, and especially Rainer's. Leap year - oops! :)

That thread was actually in preparation for another question I was 
wondering 
about the Leonids: is there enough data from the 1933 and 1966 storms, plus 
the 
last few years' activity, to say if the storm peak will likely occur during 
the "normal" maximum? I know there's quite a bit of Leonid controversy 
right 
now, but I just thought I'd slip this question in under folks' radar... ;>

Lew

Follow-Ups: