Re: (meteorobs) NAMN Meteor Report Jun 10/11

• To: Meteor Observing Mailing List <meteorobs@jovian.com>
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) NAMN Meteor Report Jun 10/11
• From: Lew Gramer <dedalus@latrade.com>
• Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 18:36:38 -0400
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:33:53 EDT." <01BEB73D.3D594060@ha1-23.eclipsedot net>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@jovian.com

Thanks for sharing one of your most recent reports with us, Wayne! It should be
useful for folks trying to learn to format their own IMO-standard reports, and
also I noted some interesting stuff in the details of your data: for example,
the very low number of "anthelion radiant" meteors vs. "IMO Sagitarrids" you
saw... Apparently, IMO's observationally-derived radiant really does seem to
describe the activity from ecliptical sources better - at least this week. :)

Clear skies,
Lew


To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• (meteorobs) NAMN Meteor Report Jun 10/11
• From: Wayne T Hally <meteors@eclipsedot net>

• Prev: (meteorobs) Re: (meteorite-list) list policy poll
• Next: RE: (meteorobs) Excerpts from "CCNet DIGEST, 15 June 1999
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread