Re: (meteorobs) Observations 23/24

• To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Observations 23/24
• From: Mark Davis <MeteorObs@charlestondot net>
• Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:16:19 -0400
• References: <19990625122038.AAA22055%maildot sioldot net@Exceldot sioldot net>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@jovian.com

From: exceld77 <excel@sioldot net>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 8:26 AM

>So the best explanation is that the Perseid radiant is not active yet and
>that this meteor just lined up with the projected radiant?

>If so, I will label this meteor as a sporadic.

Hi Jure,

That is certainly a possibility. What I would do is label it as a sporadic,
but in my "Comments" field, I would list it as a possible Perseid. This is
actually done quite a bit by observers and provides a means to allow
researchers to go back through reports for confirmation when something new
turns up.

Btw, I would like to archive your reports with other NAMN observers if that
is okay with you.

Clear skies!

Mark


To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• Re: (meteorobs) Observations 23/24
• From: "Malcolm J. Currie" <mjc@jach.hawaiidot edu>

• From:

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Tunguska bolide & Beta taurid stream
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Tunguska bolide & Beta taurid stream
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread