[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
(meteorobs) Re: Angular velocities
Pierre Martin wrote:
>
> > I would seem to agree with George's comments here. Recording data on
> > the field should be kept as simple or easy as possible to ensure
> > accurate data, even among more experienced observers.
"Malcolm J. Currie" wrote:
>
> Are there any dissenters to that view? The question at issue is
> whether the different methods impose extra demands on the observer
> during the watch.
I agree with Pierre that methods should be kept simple in the field. I
would also ask him if he will be recording meteors in exactly the same
manner 10 years from now? Maybe so, but like many bright and inquisitive
minds Pierre will absorb more knowledge and experiment with different
techniques as how to gather data. Isn't it every serious observer's goal
to obtain the most accurate data possible? If new techniques appear
does one bury their head in the sand or analyze it with an open mind?
I understand the logic behind the idea "the less I record the more
accurate my data will be". On the other hand does limiting the
parameters provide a better overall understanding of the event?
I would bet that down the road Pierre will look back at 1999 and feel he
has made great strides. Pierre is a competent observer now but in 2009
he will look back upon this discussion and smile at all the efforts to
"keep it simple".
For me, I am light years better than I was 10 years ago and I hope to
continue to progress in the years to come. Bringing this full circle,
would I continue to record all of this data if it were not enjoyable?
Does recording one or two more aspects of meteors turn it into a chore?
Not in the least as it has become second nature for me and it can become
second nature for anyone truly interested in progressing to the next
level.
Clear Skies!
Bob Lunsford
To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html
Follow-Ups:
References: