[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

FW:Re: (meteorobs) METEORS VS FIREBALLS/BOLIDES



From: "E. L. Jones" <jonee@epixdot net>

(I think this bounced due to a funny word, don't worry about it)



Hello,
All bolides are fireballs--  but not all fireballs are bolides.

I have been fortunate enough to have seen two bolides in my life-- up close 
and personal.  I have seen many fireballs.   I can attest that there is a 
 dynamic and awesome difference in a bolide and a fireball.  I believe that 
a bolide will always have an aural report (in addition to any sonic 
shockwaves i.e sonic "booms"). whether or not the observer is close enough 
for it to be heard.  I subscribe to the distinction  between them is as 
follows:

A Bolide ia a body which has a "rapid (explosive) expansion at or near the 
end of incandescent flight"

A Fireball is a body which ceases to shine either in  burning up or 
reaching dark flight (height of retardation) without the explosive 
expansion.

The presence and intensity of  audible reports, other then sonic boom 
generated ones,  may have something to do with the altitude and air 
density. High altitude explosions are absorbed/depleted faster in the low 
gas pressures of the upper atmosphere where much is lost in spanning the 
larger gaps in molecule to molecule transmission.  The lower altitudes are 
much denser and transmit sound energy more effectively.  Lower altitudes 
and higher densities also act more solidly on the momentum of the 
meteoroid. This would create more harsh internal shearing inside the body, 
causing it to disintegrate.

All this is to say  I believe bolides of stone / iron bodies probably occur 
at lower altitudes and are therefore more dynamic than the average 
fireball-- if we assume a higher altitude extinction for these.   I would 
also suggest that a low density , loosely consolidated, comet body  will 
shear earlier and therefore "explode" higher,  but without an audible 
report to ground observers.

While the distinction via definition remains subjective, and is 
nondescriptive of causes,  "bolide" should be reserved for an explosive 
variety of fireballs.  We frequently make a distinction between fireballs 
and run of the mill meteors, do we not?  How do we chose to define a 
fireball to distinguish it amongst other meteor related phenomena?

Regards,
Elton




To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

Follow-Ups: