Re: (meteorobs) Re: Some Perseid photos

• To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Re: Some Perseid photos
• From: Rob McNaught <rmn@aaocbn.aaodot gov.au>
• Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 06:03:39 +1000 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990821094032.007f3600@amsmeteors.org>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@jovian.com

Angular resolution also depends on the distance of the object, which at
low elevations is likely to be distant

Robert H. McNaught
rmn@aaocbn.aaodot gov.au

On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Jim Bedient wrote:

> At 09:11 PM 8/21/99 +1000, Robert H. McNaught wrote:
> >Sorry Jim, I've got plenty of photos of aircraft without additional lights
> >or strobes, so their absense does not disprove it being an aircraft
> >
> 
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but you run a fisheye all-sky type system though,
> is that not correct?  I might expect that in a system with low angular
> resolution, but not on a photo with a normal lens.
> 
> JB   
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
> http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html
> 

To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• Re: (meteorobs) Re: Some Perseid photos
• From: Jim Bedient <bedient@amsmeteors.org>

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Re: Some Perseid photos
• Next: Re: FW:Re: (meteorobs) METEORS VS FIREBALLS/BOLIDES
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread