[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: (meteorobs) Limiting Magnitude
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 05:51:23 -0500 "Kim S. Youmans" <ksyo@pinelanddot net>
writes:
> Lew,
> Actually, I thought I'd wind up putting my foot much farther down
> my throat
> than I must have in my reply to Asaf! I do indeed recall reading
> that star
> counts should come from at or near zenith, but let disinformation
> from another
> source overide what was only a vague recall.
> The truth is, I'd rather use zenithal areas only for the exact
> reasons you
> state...the ease in counting. Besides, if I can count areas at and
> near zenith, I
> come up with higher LM's, which gives me a small motivational boost
> to get out
> there and observe. And I'm certainly glad you "called" me on it,
> else I would
> have continued counting stars on the horizon!
> But I must admit that haven't always counted three fields like I
> should.
> During my first year out, I simply have not wanted the "work" to
> spoil the
> "enjoyment," knowing that in time I'd be more familiar with all the
> (usable)
> fields and their star patterns.
> Kim Youmans
>
> Lew Gramer wrote:
>
> > Kim Youmans posted a great reply to Asaf's questions on Limiting
> Magnitude.
> > As Kim says, recording frequent LMs is one of the things which
> distinguishes
> > a scientific amateur meteor observer from someone "just watching"
> - without
> > the LM (and probably at least magnitude estimates for the meteors
> you see),
> > people will have great difficulty making any scientific use of
> what you saw.
> >
> > Your logs won't necessarily be "USELESS"! But the work needed to
> render your
> > observation comparable to those of other observers around the
> world, and the
> > inherent errors introduced by this kind of "compensation after the
> fact",
> > make it really FAR less likely that you'll make a major
> contribution...
> >
> > One gnit to gpick on Kim's reply, where he wrote:
> >
> > >A good observer will count at least three of these regions, one
> near zenith,
> > >one at about 40-60 degrees up, and one near the horizon to get a
> much better
> > >idea what his/her total LM really is. After all, meteors appear
> in any part
> > >of the sky, right? ...
> >
> > Actually, Kim this is exactly what I assumed when I started out -
> but is not
> > what the IMO recommends... Reading carefully over the IMO page on
> LMs at:
> >
> > http://www.imodot net/visual/major01.html#sec52
> >
> > note that they define Limiting Magnitude as "the magnitude of the
> faintest
> > star *near the zenith* that the observer can detect using slightly
> averted
> > naked eye". And later on, they explicitly state that "The [LM
> star] fields
> > should have an elevation of more than 40o".
> >
> > So in practice, for my own half-hourly LM star counts, I try to
> use the two
> > (or three) LM fields which are closest to the Zenith, and that
> DON'T require
> > me to move my body or crane my neck at all to count them. That
> latter item
> > is key: I've often noted that even craning my neck 30 degrees can
> really
> > reduce star counts due to distraction and lack of bloodflow to my
> eyes (or
> > brain??), and can even cause what I call "strobing" - where
> brighter areas
> > of my peripheral vision seem to "blink" brighter and fainter very
> rapidly.
> >
> > [Does anyone else experience this "strobing", especially when
> fatigued?]
> >
> > Clear skies and comfortable star counts everybody!
> > Lew
> >
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form
> at:
> > http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
> http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html
Lew:
I was under the im-pression that it was a matter of " age " that created
my so called blinking. Now I must admit that this scenario is experienced
by others. I also have a nasty habit of " cranibg " my neck to aquire a
different view. Thanks for clearing this up.
Sincerely
Art Tello
San Diego
To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html