[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

(meteorobs) Excerpts from "CCNet, 034/2000 - 17 March 2000"




Note in particular the item regarding meteor showers potentially observable at
Mars: Amazing the synchonicity here, as this very thread came up not too long
ago here on the 'meteorobs' forum...

Clear skies!
Lew Gramer <owner-meteorobs@jovian.com>

------- Forwarded Message

From: Benny J Peiser <b.j.peiser@livjm.acdot uk>
To: cambridge-conference@livjm.acdot uk
Subject: CCNet, 17 March 2000
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 12:51:19 -0500 (EST)

CCNet, 034/2000 - 17 March 2000
-------------------------------

(1) YUKON METEORITE MAY PROVIDE "NEW WINDOW INTO 
    THE UNIVERSE"
    NASANews@hq.nasadot gov 
 
[...]
 
(4) WOBBLY ASTEROIDS AND COMETS
    M. Efroimsky*) & A. Lazarian, HARVARD UNIVERSITY

(5) METEOROID STREAMS AT MARS
    A.A. Christou*) & K. Beurle, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON

[...]

(8) ASTEROID SPIN PARAMETER
    Jeremy Tatum <UNIVERSE@uvvm.UVicdot ca> 

(9) FAST RESPONSE TO FAST-SPINNING ASTEROIDS
    Charles F. Peterson <cfp@mcn.org> 

[...]

========================================================

(1) YUKON METEORITE MAY PROVIDE "NEW WINDOW INTO 
    THE UNIVERSE"

>From NASANews@hq.nasadot gov 
 
Donald Savage
Headquarters, Washington, DC                      March 16, 2000
(Phone:  202/358-1547)

Ann Hutchison
Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX
(Phone:  281/483-5111)

Jean-Claude Paradis
Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON 
(Phone:  613/992-9426)   

RELEASE:  00-41

YUKON METEORITE MAY PROVIDE "NEW WINDOW INTO THE UNIVERSE"

     A meteorite that exploded over a remote area of northwest 
Canada in January may offer "a new window into the universe before 
the solar system was created," said a NASA scientist who has begun 
analyzing some of the meteorite fragments.

     The very primitive composition and pristine condition of the 
4.5-billion-year-old meteorite "offers us a snapshot of the 
original composition of the entire solar system before the planets 
formed," said Dr. Michael Zolensky, a cosmic mineralogist at 
NASA's Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston.  "It tells us what 
the initial materials were like that went into making up the 
Earth, the Moon and the Sun."  The age of the solar system is 
about 4.5 billion years.
  
     "These meteorite fragments are of immense scientific value 
and interest," said Dr. Richard Herd, Curator of National 
Collections for the Geological Survey of Canada.  "This rare find 
potentially will contribute to a better understanding of the 
nature of the universe."  He added that finding previously 
undetected compounds in the fragments will have implications for 
both planetary and biological sciences worldwide.

     The scientists described the fragments -- lumps of crumbly 
rock with scorched, pitted surfaces -- as resembling partly used 
charcoal briquettes:  black, porous, fairly light and still 
smelling of sulfur. 

     Several factors combined to make this meteorite a cosmic 
bonanza for scientists.  First, it is a carbonaceous chondrite, a 
rare type of meteorite that contains many forms of carbon and 
organics, basic building blocks of life.  Carbonaceous chondrites, 
which comprise only about 2 percent of meteorites known to have 
fallen to Earth, are typically difficult to recover because they 
easily break down during entry into Earth's atmosphere and during 
weathering on the ground.   

     Zolensky said the last time a carbonaceous chondrite like 
this fell to Earth and was recovered was 31 years ago.   "This is 
probably the only time in my career this will happen," he said. 

     The location and timing of the fireball also contributed to 
the scientific value of the samples.  The fragments are part of a 
meteor that blew apart over a remote area of the Yukon Territory 
the morning of Jan. 18, 2000.  The resulting sonic booms startled 
residents as far away as British Columbia and Alaska.  The frozen, 
snow-covered ground of the remote Yukon provided near-ideal 
conditions for preservation, Herd said.  

     The finder, a local resident who has requested anonymity, 
collected the fragments in clean plastic bags and kept them 
continuously frozen.  These are the only freshly fallen meteorite 
fragments recovered and transferred to a laboratory without 
thawing.  Keeping the fragments continuously frozen minimized the 
potential loss of organics and other volatile compounds in the 
fragments.

     About 2 pounds of meteorite fragments have been recovered so 
far.  Of those, Zolensky has about a pound of fragments provided 
by the Canadian government and the University of Calgary.  The 
finder loaned them to the university and to the National Meteorite 
Collection of the Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources 
Canada (NRCan) in Ottawa, which provided the still-frozen samples 
to JSC for study and analysis.  NASA is working closely with NRCan 
scientists and is providing results of the analysis to them.  "We 
are very sensitive to the fact that these are Canadian 
meteorites," Zolensky said.  Any future studies will be done in 
cooperation with scientists worldwide.
  
     Scientific analysis of the fragments has just begun.  Tests 
have been limited to two non-destructive activities: making a thin 
section to analyze the mineralogy of the fragments, and measuring 
induced radioactivity.  Tests for induced radioactivity, which are 
being carried out by Dr. David Lindstrom of JSC, measure the 
object's exposure to space radiation.  This can be used to 
determine the size of the original meteoroid in space, estimates 
of which range up to 50 feet in diameter, with a mass of more than 
55 tons. 

     The next step in the study of the fragments will be baseline 
analyses of the organics in the meteorite.  This would require the 
destruction of some samples, and negotiations are under way with 
the finder for permission to do such tests. 

     "The nice thing about having a sample like this is that you 
don't really know what you're going to find or where it's going to 
lead," Zolensky said.  "You can tuck samples away for the future 
when new questions come along that people can't even think up 
now."  

========================================================

(4) WOBBLY ASTEROIDS AND COMETS

M. Efroimsky*) & A. Lazarian: Inelastic dissipation in wobbling 
asteroids and comets. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL 
SOCIETY, 2000, Vol.311, No.2, pp.269-278

*) HARVARD UNIVERSITY,DEPT PHYS,17 A OXFORD ST,CAMBRIDGE,MA,02138

Asteroids and comets dissipate energy when they rotate about any axis 
different from the axis of the maximal moment of inertia. We show that 
the most efficient internal relaxation happens at twice the frequency 
of the precession of the body. Therefore earlier estimates that ignore 
the double frequency input underestimate the internal relaxation in 
asteroids and comets. We suggest that seismological data of the Earth 
may poorly represent the acoustic properties of asteroids and comets as 
internal relaxation increases in the presence of moisture. At the same 
time, owing to the non-linearity of inelastic relaxation, small angle 
nutations can persist for very long time spans, but our ability to 
detect such precessions is limited by the resolution of the 
radar-generated images. Wobbling may provide valuable information on 
the composition and structure of asteroids and on their recent history 
of external impacts. Copyright 2000, Institute for Scientific 
Information Inc.

========================================================

(5) METEOROID STREAMS AT MARS

A.A. Christou*) & K. Beurle: Meteoroid streams at Mars: possibilities 
and implications. PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1999, Vol.47, No.12, 
pp.1475-1485

*) UNIVERSITY OF LONDON QUEEN MARY & WESTFIELD COLL,ASTRON UNIT,SCH 
   MATH SCI,MILE END RD,LONDON E1 4NS,ENGLAND

In order to assess the possibility of meteoroid streams detectable from 
the surface of Mars as meteor showers we have derived minimum distances 
and associated velocities for a large sample of small body orbits 
relative to the orbits of Mars and the Earth. The population ratio for 
objects approaching to within 0.2 AU of these two planets is found to 
be approximately 2:1. The smaller relative velocities in the case of 
Mars appears to be the main impediment to the detection of meteors in 
the upper atmosphere of that planet. We identify five bodies, including 
the unusual object (5335) Damocles and periodic comet 1P/Halley, with 
relative orbital parameters most suitable to produce prominent meteor 
showers. We identify specific epochs at which showers related to these 
bodies are expected to occur. An overview of possible detection methods 
taking into account the unique characteristics of the Martian 
environment is presented. We pay particular attention on the effects of 
such streams on the dust rings believed to be present around Mars. (C) 
1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

============================
* LETTERS TO THE MODERATOR *
============================

(8) ASTEROID SPIN PARAMETER

>From Jeremy Tatum <UNIVERSE@uvvm.UVicdot ca> 

Concerning the recent correspondence concerning what spin parameter 
is most significant about an asteroid, I was encouraged that Petr 
Pravec suggested the ratio between centrifugal and gravitational 
force, because just last week I made my students calculate exactly 
that quantity (also including oblateness effects) for the major 
planets Mercury to Neptune.  Not surprisingly, the effeect is very 
pronounced for rapidly-rotating oblate Jupiter  and negligible for 
slowly-rotating spherical Venus.  Perhaps I should not get them to 
repeat the same calculation for all 100,000 asteroids, or however 
many there are.

I suppose it might also be argued that what causes an asteroid to 
spin rapidly might be an oblique collision by an impactor.  In that 
case, I think the asteroid experiences an impulsive torque, and the 
time integral of that torque results in (indeed is equal to) a change 
in the angular momentum of the asteroid.  From that point of view, I 
suppose one could argue that the significant spin parameter would be 
the asteroid's angular momentum - which is proportional to the 
product of the linear speed at the equator, and the radius and the 
mass.

In any case, rather than make my students calculate any of these 
quantities for 100,000 asteroids, I shall torture them with another
one this morning:  A spherical asteroid is struck obliquely. Show 
that the centre of the asteroid will move forwards if the impact
parameter is less than 40% of the radius; otherwise it moves 
backwards. 

Enjoy.

Jeremy Tatum

========================================================

(9) FAST RESPONSE TO FAST-SPINNING ASTEROIDS

>From Charles F. Peterson <cfp@mcn.org> 

Many thanks for Petr Pravec's prompt response. There is so much to 
keep in mind, and there are so many exciting, new programs and 
discoveries. Thank goddess for the internet and CCnet! Access to ask 
questions...  access to answers...

Charles F. Peterson

----------------------------------------
THE CAMBRIDGE-CONFERENCE NETWORK (CCNet)
----------------------------------------
The CCNet is a scholarly electronic network. To subscribe/unsubscribe, 
please contact the moderator Benny J Peiser <b.j.peiser@livjm.acdot uk>. 
Information circulated on this network is for scholarly and 
educational use only. The attached information may not be copied or 
reproduced for any other purposes without prior permission of the 
copyright holders. The fully indexed archive of the CCNet, from 
February 1997 on, can be found at:

    http://abob.libs.ugadot edu/bobk/cccmenu.html 

------- End of Forwarded Message

To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html