Re: (meteorobs) Asher-McNaught model in doubt... (fwd)

• To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Asher-McNaught model in doubt... (fwd)
• From: Markku Vanamo <mvanamo@sci.fi>
• Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 01:22:41 +0200
• References: <Pine.SOL.3.93.1001128100401.11690C-100000@aaocbnu1.aaodot gov.au>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@jovian.com

Rob McNaught wrote:
> 
> Remember, our fit used an (arbitrary) double Gaussian and a similar function
> with shallower slopes will result in an improved fit to the 2000 (and 1969)
> data.
>

	How far does this Gaussian reach?  I mean, if we were lucky to
hit the densiest part of any certain dust trail for 20 years, how many
of these years (after the comet) would produce a storm?

Markku

To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• Re: (meteorobs) Asher-McNaught model in doubt... (fwd)
• From: Rob McNaught <rmn@aaocbn.aaodot gov.au>

• (meteorobs) Asher-McNaught model in doubt... (fwd)
• From: Rob McNaught <rmn@aaocbn.aaodot gov.au>

• Prev: (meteorobs) Leonids 2000 video and photo 16-17
• Next: (meteorobs) Leonid pictures turns out ok...
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread