Re: (meteorobs) zodiacal light on Jan 03, 2001

• To: Meteor Observing Mailing List <meteorobs@jovian.com>
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) zodiacal light on Jan 03, 2001
• From: Lew Gramer <dedalus@latrade.com>
• Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 12:39:50 -0500
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 Jan 2001 19:57:52 EST." <10.73851ee.278d0d90@aol.com>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@jovian.com

>> Another target somewhat brighter, and so often accessible from sites
>> where the Zodiacal Band is too faint to see, is the famed Gegenschein
>...
>The Gegenschein always seem dimmer to me than the Zodiacal lights [sic].

I agree: Gegenschein is fainter than "false dawn", aka Zodiacal Light.
However, the GS is generally brighter than the Zodiacal Band, which is
what the above paragraph was referring to.

Lew


To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• Re: (meteorobs) zodiacal light on Jan 03, 2001
• From: GeoZay@aol.com

• Prev: (meteorobs) Fireball(?), 12 Jan 2000, Colorado USA
• Next: (meteorobs) [IMO-News] New meteor shower calendars: 2001 and 2002
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread