[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: (meteorobs) Huan Meng (Amend some grammar mistake)

Hello,
I'm sorry that I made some grammar mistakes in last email, now I amend them.
  The first line of the second paragraph, change "It seemed Kim and all some
others..." into "It seemed Kim and some others...".
  The last line of the second paragraph, change "Now I try explaining that
my meaning ..." into "Now I try explaining that my meaning more minute
again" (delete the word "that").
  I hope all of you can understand it this time. And sorry to trouble you.


All best wishes and Clear skies!
Huan Meng   meteorobs@263dot net


----- Original Message -----
From: Huan Meng <meteorobs@263dot net>
To: <meteorobs@jovian.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Huan Meng


> Hi, Kim and Jin,
> Many thanks for your reply. I'm very very very sorry that my English is so
> weak, that few man can understand the article clearly. And I sent the
> article about the "radiant" only once to MeteorObs, IMO-News and LEO2001
> mailing list, but I don't know why it was sent to MeteorObs again from
> LEO2001.
>   It seemed that Kim and all some others couldn't understand that article.
> Now I try explaining that my meaning more minute again.
>
>   From 1998, I started to observe LEO shower. In 1998 and 1999, I draw all
> the meteors on some maps. Later I found that there appeared too many
meteors
> from northern sky, the Year 1999 especially. I thought it must be a
unknown
> radiant in northern sky at that moment. When I was observing LEO in 2000,
I
> found there were still many sporadics from the northern sky. In my report
> for LEO 2000 which to IMO, I also reported the radiant in the remarks. In
> the process I observed, I found the radiant might be in Auriga. (That
time,
> I observed by tape, no maps. But I made a mistake in my input -- I input
> most sporadics from "Cygnus", but I should input "Auriga".)
>   From then on, I began to sort out all my maped data before, and looked
for
> more dara from all the country. Then I found 30 meteors came from one
point.
> (The coordinate of it was given in the article about " new radiant".) And
> the point was just in Auriga. Besides this radiant, I found there may be
> another two radiants, I gave there radiant in that article, too.
>   At the end of that article, it was my intention to ask more people to
pay
> attention at the possible radiants.
>   End
>
>   Can more men understand my meaning better this time?
>
>
>
> All best wishes and Clear skies!
> Huan Meng   meteorobs@263dot net

To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html
References: