Re: (meteorobs) Automated Meteor Observing

• To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Automated Meteor Observing
• From: fb4a042@botanik.botanik.uni-hamburgdot de
• Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:13:45 +0200
• In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.3.93.1010328091015.783A-100000@aaocbnu1.aaodot gov.au>
• References: <3AC046E1.DA6754BF@earthlinkdot net>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@jovian.com
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@jovian.com

> If using an intensifier is too difficult or costly, you should try an
> ultra-miniture (these things are TINY) high sensitivity Watec 902H (the NTSC
> version has a different code I believe) which with AGC Hi gives 0.0003 lux
> at f/1.4.  It is no intensifier, but is much better than most "low light
> level" security cameras.  In Australia they cost A$500.

That sounds great - does anyone have any idea on the limiting
magnitude that can be achieved with the Watec ? What is 
the chip size ? 

Hartwig

H. Luethen
h.luthen@botanik.uni-hamburgdot de
priv: Behnstr. 13, D-22767 Hamburg
lab: Institut fuer Allgemeine Botanik, Ohnhorststr. 18
     D-22609 Hamburg, Germany
Tel: 0049 (0)40-3800551 priv
     0049 (0)40-428-16-346



To UNSUBSCRIBE from the 'meteorobs' email list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• Re: (meteorobs) Automated Meteor Observing
• From: Rob McNaught <rmn@aaocbn.aaodot gov.au>

• (meteorobs) Automated Meteor Observing
• From: Robert Gardner <rendrag@earthlinkdot net>
• Re: (meteorobs) Automated Meteor Observing
• From: Rob McNaught <rmn@aaocbn.aaodot gov.au>

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Another bright SoCal meteor?
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Automated Meteor Observing
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread