Re: (meteorobs) Re: Hot Meteoroids and Scientific Reasoning

• To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Re: Hot Meteoroids and Scientific Reasoning
• From: Dave English <prospector@sd.znet.com>
• Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 08:37:04 -0800
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mh@atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Organization: none
• References: <20010801191457.0891437956@w221.z066089060.bos-ma.dsl.cncdot net> <3B688A2F.8C93EDE3@epixdot net>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org

I appreciate the level of discussion we are seeing on meteorobs about hot or 
cold meteorites. What I have objected to all along was the rejection by the 
members on meteorobs of reports from ordinary people about hot 
meteorites. A hot meteorite report has been the low bar to judge the 
validity of the report AND person and I've felt it was unfair and closed 
minded as there's so much we do not know for certain. These discussions 
have been good but perhaps it's time to make room for the many posts  
about the major shower we are approaching and pick it up in a few weeks.

      Clear Skies and many bolides.                  Dave English
                                                                  Oceanside, California

To stop getting email from the 'meteorobs' list, use the Web form at:
http://www.tiacdot net/users/lewkaren/meteorobs/subscribe.html

• (meteorobs) Re: Hot Meteoroids and Scientific Reasoning
• From: "E.L. Jones" <jonee@epixdot net>

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Re: Hot Meteoroids and Scientific Reasoning
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Planetary Impacts etc.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread