[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: (meteorobs) Estimating magnitudes
In a message dated 12/15/01 5:45:34 PM Eastern Standard Time,
chall@cyberusdot ca writes:
<< Each month, in our newsletter NAMN Notes, we also give the brightness of
the
planets. Note that the planets do change in brightness! For December, yes,
it is -2.7, according to the RASC Observers Handbook, published by the Royal
Astronomical Society of Canada. By next July, though, it will have gotten
fainter, and will only be -1.8.
>>
Cathy --
You (and everyone else) should be aware of the fact that in the 2001 RASC
Observer's Handbook, there was a significant error regarding the apparent
brightness of the planet Saturn. Traditionally, the magnitudes of the
planets were always taken from the Astronomical Almanac of the U.S. Naval
Observatory, but apparently, in 2001, the gentleman who writes "The Sky Month
by Month" section (David Lane) utilized a different computer software program
to produce the 2001 planet magnitudes. In the case of Saturn, the published
figures were found to be too bright by as much as 0.4 to 0.5 magnitudes!
As an example, on December 11 in the 2001 Handbook (page 80), Saturn's
magnitude was listed as an overly-bright -0.9 (rivaling Canopus), when it
really should have been listed as -0.4.
Earlier this year I had contacted the Handbook's Editor, Rajiv Gupta, to
inquire about this. He quickly responded by apologizing for the error and
assuring me that in the 2002 Handbook that the planet magnitudes would again
be based solely on the U.S. Naval Observatory data.
-- joe rao
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
If you are interested in complete links on the 2001 LEONIDS, see:
http://www.meteorobs.org/storms.html
To stop getting email from the 'meteorobs' list, use the Web form at:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html
Follow-Ups: