Re: (meteorobs) No outburst from Ursids in 2001?

• To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) No outburst from Ursids in 2001?
• From: Francisco =?iso-8859-1?Q?Oca=F1a?= <paco1987@jazzfree.com>
• Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 00:22:46 +0100
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mh@atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• References: <23CD705C8BAED5119AB000508BBD81403B6167@opmmail.minedu.fi>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org

Hi!

Can anyone to explain what the mean anomaly factor means?

Thanks,

Francisco Ocaņa

>
>
> Actually an encounter with a trailet from 1392 was found. The encounter is
> at about rD-rE=0.001au, which is a relative close encounter, considering the
> trail age. It appears however that the trailet has near the encounter, the
> very small mean anomaly factor (fM) of about 0.0002. A comparison with the
> 2000 encouter is difficult because of quite different local properties of
> the two trailets.
>
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
If you are interested in complete links on the 2001 LEONIDS, see:
http://www.meteorobs.org/storms.html
To stop getting email from the 'meteorobs' list, use the Web form at:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html

• Re: (meteorobs) No outburst from Ursids in 2001?
• From: Robert Gardner <rendrag@earthlinkdot net>

• (meteorobs) No outburst from Ursids in 2001?
• From: Esko.Lyytinen@MINEDU.FI

• Prev: (meteorobs) Geminid origin
• Next: Re: (meteorobs) Geminid origin
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread