[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: (meteorobs) Re: Leo 2001 coverage in S&T 3/2002
In a message dated 2/5/02 2:13:24 PM Eastern Standard Time,
dstine@exposquare.com writes:
<< TO PUT IT BLUNTLY ...<snip>...THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE A COMPLETE SPECIAL
ISSUE. >>
No way would that ever happen. Besides the cost of a separate issue, the
readership wouldn't be there. While every one of us on this list, what is it
now ~400, would eat it up. 400 + even if we say there was another 4,000 out
there not being able to find meteorobs and the IMO, etc... that is just a
drop in the bucket to the number of people that would give it a cursory
glance and off to something else. What I would expect to see is a number of
names from this list writing the majority of the meteor articles. KK
~~~~
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html
Follow-Ups: