Re: (meteorobs) Overdense or Es?

• To: meteorobs@atmob.org, meteorobs@atmob.org
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Overdense or Es?
• From: Tony Beresford <aberesford@iprimus.com.au>
• Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 20:41:16 +0930
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc@atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• In-Reply-To: <20020608225718.41789.qmail@web11403.mail.yahoo.com>
• References: <5.0.0.25.2.20020608194659.00a35ca0@mail.bbtel.com>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org

At 08:27 9/06/02, Thomas Dorman wrote:
>Hi.Shelby
>Good question to what I observed 11UT-14UT June 5.From
>all the e-mail I received, all the web sites I have
>been told to look at the basic question has still not
>been answereddot can the human ear tell the difference
>between sporadic E layer and radio meteor events in
>the commercial FM band? 

Thomas and Shelby,
I dont think you probably can tell sporsdic E propogation
and meteor echoes by listening. To tell sporadic E you need to look at
ionograms or at least study the reduced FoEs published for reduced iniosondes.
A list of online ionosondes is given here. None that nearer New Mexico
than Dyer AFB in Texas and thats not available at the moment.

http://www.amfmdxdot net/fmdx/ionosonde.html

Tony Beresford
Adelaide So. Australia


The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html

• (meteorobs) Overdense or Es?
• From: "Shelby Ennis, W8WN" <w8wn@arrldot net>
• Re: (meteorobs) Overdense or Es?
• From: Thomas Dorman <drygulch_99@yahoo.com>

• Prev: (meteorobs) Weekly IRC Meteor Chat on Monday!
• Next: (meteorobs) meteor outbursts in June 2002
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread