RE: 14. (meteorobs) Fw: Lightning as the initiator

• To: <meteorobs@atmob.org>
• Subject: RE: 14. (meteorobs) Fw: Lightning as the initiator
• From: "Peter Brunone" <peter@brunone.com>
• Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 15:34:50 -0600
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc2@galaxy.atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Importance: Normal
• In-Reply-To: <3E4449CE.401DDD81@penn.com>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org

|At this point, until other evidence is available, light or stray flash
|of electron discharges should be "blamed" for the disaster.

	Did you mean to add a "not" in there?

|-----Original Message-----
|From: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org [mailto:owner-meteorobs@atmob.org]On
|Behalf Of drobnock
|Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 6:06 PM
|To: meteorobs@atmob.org
|Subject: 14. (meteorobs) Fw: Lightning as the initiator
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html

• 14. (meteorobs) Fw: Lightning as the initiator
• From: drobnock <drobnock@penn.com>

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Casual backyard ACE'S
• Next: (meteorobs) RE: Fw: Lightning as the initiator
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread