[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: (meteorobs) Re: darrell conger
----- Original Message -----
From: <nmcleod@peganet.com>
> later. Conger must have been around perception 5.0 to 6.0, while Gates
was
> 3.8, and mine at 1.0. I don't know how data from super-percepted
observers
> can be used, as what they see can't be confirmed by the vast majority of
> other observers. Most of the showers must look like mini-storms to them.
> All of our effort is diverted into studying the individual instead of his
> results, but it's an exercise in masochism and futility as there is
nothing
> firm enough to hang any concrete conclusions on.
>
Norman:
Does Sirko's video data support these high visual rates by Gates et al?
If these rates are "true" there must be some correlation.
Ed Majden
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html
Follow-Ups:
References: