[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
(meteorobs) Perseids 2003 well 2002 was still P...
Thanks. But when a meteor shower really puffs out and does not produce any
notable fireballs or something significant (a Perseid shower should produce at
least one memorable meteor) it is PUTRID. I like watching meteors as much as
anyone but I like something to remember.
I would rather have a few bright ones then a lot of lesser magnitude ones.
Maybe with the moon and Perseids we can all get lucky this year.
Dr.Eric Flescher (kcstarguy@aol.com)webmaster Eric's Black Sun Eclipse
website - <ericsblacksuneclipse.com>webmaster, Satori Astronomy website
<http://members.aol.com/kcstarguy/blacksun/satoriastronomy.htm> -editor- Black Sun
eclipse newsletter (eclipse/astronomy news) to subscribe send email to
blacksuneclipse-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: event-horizon/SJL <event_horizon@sbcglobaldot net>
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) perseids in 2003 hopefully better then 2002
- --0-1288922159-1058664750=:40647
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
PUTRID, in its proper descriptive use and application contextually, may not
be applied in the context of observing meteors, even though they are, or my be,
partly oxidized during their incursion into the upper strata of the
atmosphere.
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html