[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: (meteorobs) re: Chicago fire??
-
To: meteorobs@atmob.org
-
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) re: Chicago fire??
-
From: joel carpenter <imagery@ufx.org>
-
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 21:50:16 -0500
-
Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc2@galaxy.atmob.org
-
Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
-
In-Reply-To: <40512301.79A70091@penn.com>
-
References: <40512301.79A70091@penn.com>
-
Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
-
Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org
I sure don't know the answer, George, but maybe there's more insight in
Dr Wood's recent paper. (I haven't seen the text). I have the
impression that most scientists think the fire had origins similar to
most fires - accidents of some type - rather than comet fragments...
Joel Carpenter
> Thank you Joel.
> Your information is the timely. What is the original source of the
> Chicago fire - a legend or myth.? Or an accident of a cow?
> (Please before it goes further, I understand that some myths and
> legends do have their bases in a fragmeted fact.)
> Fini.
>
> George John Drobnock
The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html
References: