Re: (meteorobs) Park Forest Meteorite

• To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Park Forest Meteorite
• From: Richard Kramer <kramer@sria.com>
• Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 21:08:00 -0400
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc2@galaxy.atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.53.0404160028070.393805@rlsaxps.bnsc.rl.acdot uk>
• References: <20040412133533.A5620@milkyway.gsfc.nasadot gov> <20040412133533.A5620@milkyway.gsfc.nasadot gov>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org

At 12:29 AM 4/16/04 +0100, you wrote:
>Since the list is quiet this slightly off topic link may be of interest
>
>http://www.universetoday.com/am/publish/scientists_analyze_meteor_fragments.html

Isn't science wonderful...

"that came from a larger mass that weighed no less than 1,980"

They nailed that minimum weight to within 10 pounds. What masterful finesse!

Richard Kramer

The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html

• (meteorobs) Fwd: New Bright Comet Alert!
• From: George Gliba <gliba@milkyway.gsfc.nasadot gov>
• (meteorobs) Park Forest Meteorite
• From: "Malcolm J. Currie" <mjc@star.rl.acdot uk>

• Prev: Re: (meteorobs) Park Forest Meteorite
• Next: (meteorobs) Cmet 2004 F4 Bradfield
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread