Re: (IAAC) RE: Art/Not art (was: NGC 7000 etc.)

• To: Internet Amateur Astronomers Catalog - Discussion <netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org>
• Subject: Re: (IAAC) RE: Art/Not art (was: NGC 7000 etc.)
• From: Lew Gramer <dedalus@latrade.com>
• Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:25:32 -0400
• Delivered-To: netastrocatalog-announce-mhonarc@atmob.org
• Delivered-To: netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Oct 2001 15:20:33 EDT." <19666-3BC1FC81-2002@storefull-251.iap.bryant.webtv.net>
• Reply-To: netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org

I have been enjoying the posts on this thread immensely... Thank you
to ALL the posters who contributed their point of view!

However, regrettably, I must suggest that the 'astrosketch' email
list could be a more appropriate place to carry on this particular
debate! Find them at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/astrosketch

Clear skies and thought-provoking chats to all,
Lew Gramer <owner-netastrocatalog@atmob.org>


To stop receiving all 'netastrocatalog' lists, use the Web form at:
http://www.visualdeepsky.org/subscribe.html

• Re: (IAAC) RE: Art/Not art (was: NGC 7000 etc.)
• From: Timetrav2@webtv.net (Andy and Barry)

• Prev: Re: (IAAC) RE: Art/Not art (was: NGC 7000 etc.)
• Next: RE: (IAAC) RE: Art/Not art (was: NGC 7000 etc.)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread