[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: (IAAC) NGC2313 a Dark Nebula??
There are so many "nonexistent" objects in the RNGC that if there were
some more, the whole RNGC would be "nonexistent"... ;-)
The thing is, as can be read in NGC 2000.0, notably, Sulentic and Tifft
had a deadline, and ran short of time to check for the existence of all
7,840 objects from the original NGC, plus they checked at the position
given in the original NGC, not looking for the objects at other
positions and not considering the (many) errata published since the
publication of the original NGC, many of which by Dreyer himself...
Ciel clair / Clear skies,
Pierre Paquette
http://www.starpete.tk
Groupe d'astronomes amateurs Polaris
http://www.astropolaris.tk
Répertoire des instruments d'astronomes amateurs québécois
http://www.quebecscope.tk
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org
[mailto:owner-netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org] On Behalf Of patrick
MALONEY
Sent: 7 septembre 2003 13:37
To: netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org
Subject: Re: (IAAC) NGC2313 a Dark Nebula??
The RNGC, predictably, perhaps, classes this object as "nonexistent".
Patrick
___________________________________________________________
To stop receiving all 'netastrocatalog' lists, use the Web form at:
http://www.visualdeepsky.org/subscribe.html
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.510 / Virus Database: 307 - Release Date: 2003-08-14
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.510 / Virus Database: 307 - Release Date: 2003-08-14
To stop receiving all 'netastrocatalog' lists, use the Web form at:
http://www.visualdeepsky.org/subscribe.html
References: