Re: (meteorobs) June Lyrids

To: meteorobs@latradedot com
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) June Lyrids
From: Mark Davis <MeteorObs@Charlestondot net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 1996 22:36:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date-Warning: Date header was inserted by InfoAvedot net
Reply-To: meteorobs@latradedot com
Sender: owner-meteorobs

One thing I would like to add about the June Lyrids and to add to Lew's
question:

I have also observed some activity from the radiant over the past years. I
did not totally agree with IMO removing the shower from the list, so I still
note JLYs in my observing logs that I send to AMS and ALPO, but count them
as sporadics when going to IMO. However, I also report them as JLYs to IMO
as a "Note" in case they ever go back to recognizing the shower. This may
allow them to re-evaluate the shower sometime down the road. I came up with
this "method" as a result of a discussion with Rainer Arlt, who serves as
the Director of the Visual Commission of IMO. As George mentioned earlier
though, the NAMN does not recognize this shower. But the 3-letter code is JLY...

Mark

Follow-Ups:

Re: (meteorobs) June Lyrids

From: Lew Gramer <dedalus>