[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

(meteorobs) Fwd: report from Southern California (Los Padres National Forest)



Forwarded with the author's permission.

NOTE: Bob is not a current 'meteorobs' reader. If you follow up,
please MANUALLY put 'byen00@earthlinkdot net' in your "Cc:" line.

ps. His website has truly aweseome photos! ;-)


>
>
>Subject:
>               Leonids from Los Padres National Forest (California)
>
>
>
>
>
>Here is my report:
>
>
>Setup 3 tracking mounts, 1 tripod with 2 cameras, low-light video
>camera.
>
>http://www.comet-track.com/meteor/leonids02/leonids02.html
>
>Ran meteor patrol program (10pm-5am), for Nov 18-19.  Went for
>earthgrazers with 3 cameras (early - mid evening), ended up with
>nothing.  Didn't see any huge fireballs, as in years past.
>
>Was pretty cold, it was inhibiting me.  Sleep deprivation was getting to
>
>me & I had to
>take a nap from midnight - 1am.  As I was lying down, looking up thru my
>
>van's window (to the north), I saw a long bright fireball @1:55am.  At
>that point, I was motivated to get up & start the photo run for the 2nd
>peak @ 2:40am (local time), 10:40 UT Nov 19
>
>There was a noticeable increased activity at the predicted 2nd peak.
>Photos & video show many meteors recorded. The locations of meteors were
>
>noticeably active near the radiant & near Ursa Major.  Video camera was
>monitoring the radiant.  I was watching the video monitor & could *see*
>meteors that weren't detectable with naked eye.  I saw a bunch of
>meteors near the Big Dipper, & switched the video camera towards
>there...& sure enough meteors were recorded
>
>Many bright meteors, with persistent trails. No meteors with "glow
>worms". During peak, "simultaneously occurring" meteors were observed &
>recorded (see above photos).
>
>The '02 Leonids didn't have the fireball "frenzy" as in '01 & '98.
>However, the frenetic activity near the peak with bright meteors was an
>excellent display.
>
>Photographing the nightsky with a full moon up was a real challenge.  It
>
>required exposing LOTS of film (due to extremely short exposures).
>Video is more cost-effective.  But, the film gives a high-resolution
>quality image. (at the expense of lots of frames with no meteors)
>---------
>
>
>
>Bob Yen


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html