Re: (meteorobs) NC Aurora -- but not DC

• To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Subject: Re: (meteorobs) NC Aurora -- but not DC
• From: John Pearl <John.C.Pearl@nasadot gov>
• Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:26:22 -0500
• Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc2@galaxy.atmob.org
• Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• In-Reply-To: <a06010200bbe315d9e3c9@[192.168.0.4]>
• References: <BBE2CA83.734%marksmith@yadteldot net> <a06010200bbe315d9e3c9@[192.168.0.4]>
• Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
• Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org

.....But DO REMEMBER that at low latitudes the aurorae tend to be 
HIGHLY VARIABLE, i.e., EXTREMELY TRANSIENT.  ....... So keep looking 
frequently

John

>I'm envious that someone many miles SOUTH of the Maryland/DC area 
>can see the aurora, but there is nothing visible in these skies -- 
>even though they're VERY clear, and Cassiopeia quite obvious.
>
>Enjoy!
>
>Steve
>
>
>
>
>>Hi All.
>>There have been some very bright aurora here in the Piedmont region of North
>>Carolina. There was some red and lots of green. One time it got so bright it
>>almost obscured Cassiopeia. I saw several sporadic meteors while watching.
>>Mark
>The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
>To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
>http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html

The archive and Web site for our list is at http://www.meteorobs.org
To stop getting all email from the 'meteorobs' lists, use our Webform:
http://www.meteorobs.org/subscribe.html

• (meteorobs) auroras even here
• From: "Terry Johnson" <tenacious@cyberback.com>

• (meteorobs) NC Aurora
• From: Mark Smith <marksmith@yadteldot net>
• Re: (meteorobs) NC Aurora -- but not DC
• From: Steve Walter <SteveWalter@Comcastdot net>

• Prev: (meteorobs) S. Illinois Aurora
• Next: (meteorobs) 2003 Leonids: Worldwide Radio Observation No.9
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread