Re: (IAAC) Burnham's Stars

To: <netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org>
Subject: Re: (IAAC) Burnham's Stars
From: "Kim Gowney" <kapeji@sniffout.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:06:43 -0000
Delivered-To: netastrocatalog-announce-mhonarc2@galaxy.atmob.org
Delivered-To: netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org
References: <284786B4.1D317C8E.00170AC6@aol.com> <000701c2c23d$1fc8c480$c32378d5@trafalga517a7o> <002201c2c258$1f989880$87053c3f@mycomputeriii>
Reply-To: netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org
Sender: owner-netastrocatalog-announce@atmob.org

Seperation (taken from WDS) in Skymap.

Date of last observation: 1995
Position angle: 64°
Separation: 9.8"
Magnitude of first component: 2.09
Magnitude of second component: 4.79
Spectrum: K3IIb

So even within Skymaps catalogues there remain differences,  and here as you
say Lew it is plain that the Primary is indeed the K star and not as I had
assumed the B (I had not checked first! but I thought perhaps the diffrence
may have been minor hence the mix, but no way with +2 difference)
One thing for certain, it will be among the first things I look at next time
I get out!!

Kim.

To stop receiving all 'netastrocatalog' lists, use the Web form at:
http://www.visualdeepsky.org/subscribe.html

References:

Re: (IAAC) Burnham's Stars

From: FiskeM3@aol.com

Re: (IAAC) Burnham's Stars

From: "Kim Gowney" <kapeji@sniffout.com>

Re: (IAAC) Burnham's Stars

From: "Andrew James" <andjames@ozemail.com.au>