[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: (meteorobs) Check out The very latest SOHO images
-
To: <meteorobs@atmob.org>
-
Subject: Re: (meteorobs) Check out The very latest SOHO images
-
From: "Bruce McCurdy" <bmccurdy@telusplanetdot net>
-
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:28:45 -0600
-
Delivered-To: meteorobs-mhonarc2@galaxy.atmob.org
-
Delivered-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
-
References: <1a2.23070c0a.2db48b9e@aol.com>
-
Reply-To: meteorobs@atmob.org
-
Sender: owner-meteorobs@atmob.org
> This got me thinking a bit about Hale-Bopp. I didn't follow our
celestial events as closely as I do now, but I was wondering how far before hand
there was expectation that it would be a tremendous object.
Hale-Bopp (C/1995
O1) was quite exceptional for a "new" comet in that it was discovered some 20
months before its perihelion on April 1, 1997. At discovery it was
something like 7 A.U. away, and it was known early on that it was a very large
comet.
The astronomical
world had been abuzz about the incoming Great Comet of 1997 for
some six months *before* the discovery of the Great Comet of *1996*, Hyakutake,
which was discovered only a couple of months before its spectacular apparition a
full year before that of Hale-Bopp. Which is more the norm for these things in
my (limited compared to many people on this list) experience.
Of course, with
almost all the new comets being named LINEAR and NEAT, the old norms really
don't apply anymore. Great to see Mr. Bradfield's name back in the
news. His latest find seems fairly exceptional at the other extreme, very
short lead time for such a bright comet. IF it survives.
regards,
Bruce
References: